95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.72%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 63.11%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
66.29%
Some D&A expansion while PAAS is negative at -9.45%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-104.43%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-72.78%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PAAS at -0.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
854.67%
Slight usage while PAAS is negative at -42.59%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-85.24%
AR is negative yoy while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.23%
AP growth of 209.23% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-3700.00%
Negative yoy usage while PAAS is 133.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-95.51%
Negative yoy while PAAS is 46.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
22.62%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PAAS's 72.25%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
99.88%
CapEx growth well above PAAS's 8.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-117.38%
We reduce yoy other investing while PAAS is 127.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
99.43%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PAAS's 290.58%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
91.50%
We repay more while PAAS is negative at -277.40%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.