PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
37.61%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 26.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-1.54%
Negative yoy D&A while PAAS is 13.58%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-332.84%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PAAS stands at 165.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
290.50%
SBC growth well above PAAS's 96.50%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
581.84%
Slight usage while PAAS is negative at -41.53%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
190.63%
AR growth of 190.63% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.46%
Negative yoy AP while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
140.55%
Some yoy usage while PAAS is negative at -103.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
315.58%
Well above PAAS's 20.10%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
20.34%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PAAS's 55.03%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-38886.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while PAAS is 8.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-132.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -96.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-38037.27%
We reduce yoy invests while PAAS stands at 11.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
78.80%
We repay more while PAAS is negative at -448.79%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PAAS is 149.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.