95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.53%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PAAS at -50.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.47%
Some D&A expansion while PAAS is negative at -6.86%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
65.98%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. PAAS's 603.82%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-0.72%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PAAS at -15.58%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
93.25%
Well above PAAS's 184.30% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-315.69%
AR is negative yoy while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.20%
AP growth of 209.20% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
48.86%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PAAS's 242.80%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-415.73%
Negative yoy while PAAS is 95.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.56%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PAAS's 48.68%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
66.67%
CapEx growth well above PAAS's 35.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-494.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -81.30%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-231.25%
We reduce yoy invests while PAAS stands at 29.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
10.81%
We repay more while PAAS is negative at -3913.55%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.