PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.31%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PAAS at -125.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.58%
D&A growth well above PAAS's 0.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
127.08%
Some yoy growth while PAAS is negative at -147.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-72.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PAAS at -15.88%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
266.55%
Slight usage while PAAS is negative at -46.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
223.37%
AR growth of 223.37% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.73%
Negative yoy AP while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
144.39%
Growth well above PAAS's 219.70%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
101.73%
Well above PAAS's 148.22%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-19.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PAAS at -37.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.94%
CapEx growth well above PAAS's 22.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-377.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while PAAS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-377.07%
Negative yoy purchasing while PAAS stands at 48.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-79.34%
We reduce yoy sales while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
108.52%
We have some outflow growth while PAAS is negative at -97.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-21.74%
We reduce yoy invests while PAAS stands at 11.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
64.56%
We repay more while PAAS is negative at -9.81%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.