PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
739.91%
Net income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 153.18%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.08%
Less D&A growth vs. PAAS's 32.46%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-100.59%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PAAS stands at 20.74%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-89.79%
Negative yoy SBC while PAAS is 827.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-165.93%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PAAS at -674.68%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
127.57%
AR growth of 127.57% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-162.36%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PAAS at -1623.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
58.14%
Some yoy increase while PAAS is negative at -277.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
8.97%
Some CFO growth while PAAS is negative at -208.22%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
68.13%
CapEx growth well above PAAS's 3.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.79%
We reduce yoy other investing while PAAS is 1364625.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-24.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -358.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
30.76%
We repay more while PAAS is negative at -5702.52%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.