95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 103.90%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.19%
Less D&A growth vs. PAAS's 8.78%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
0.25%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. PAAS's 225.49%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
177.90%
SBC growth while PAAS is negative at -11.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-55.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PAAS at -173.95%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-509.30%
AR is negative yoy while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Some yoy usage while PAAS is negative at -79.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-101.84%
Both negative yoy, with PAAS at -47.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
30.24%
Some CFO growth while PAAS is negative at -1.88%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while PAAS is 24.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
70800.00%
Liquidation growth of 70800.00% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
16528.30%
Growth well above PAAS's 133.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
1431.96%
Investing outflow well above PAAS's 31.47%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
6.80%
We repay more while PAAS is negative at -405.61%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.