PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PAAS at -71.62%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-21.66%
Negative yoy D&A while PAAS is 21.37%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
148.87%
Well above PAAS's 70.24% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
146.24%
SBC growth while PAAS is negative at -28.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
156.82%
Well above PAAS's 162.16% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
137.26%
AR growth of 137.26% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.44%
AP growth of 208.44% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
202.40%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PAAS's 638.76%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
166.77%
Well above PAAS's 55.51%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-6.99%
Negative yoy CFO while PAAS is 80.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
97.21%
CapEx growth well above PAAS's 1.55%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while PAAS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
138.24%
Liquidation growth of 138.24% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
84.20%
Growth well above PAAS's 86.99%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
89.72%
Investing outflow well above PAAS's 34.79%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-13.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -40.03%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-68.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -99.32%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.