PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.33%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PAAS at -325.99%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
14.34%
Some D&A expansion while PAAS is negative at -12.07%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-70.04%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-268.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PAAS at -0.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
146.27%
Slight usage while PAAS is negative at -29.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
186.50%
AR growth well above PAAS's 129.69%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-274.44%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PAAS at -355.64%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
5.27%
Lower AP growth vs. PAAS's 102.60%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-33.05%
Negative yoy usage while PAAS is 127.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-55.38%
Negative yoy while PAAS is 245.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-1.99%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PAAS at -69.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
66.20%
Some CapEx rise while PAAS is negative at -16.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.92%
Purchases growth of 86.92% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -99.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
72.51%
We have mild expansions while PAAS is negative at -33.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -7.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-69.57%
Negative yoy issuance while PAAS is 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.