PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
31.79%
Net income growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 58.99%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-15.06%
Negative yoy D&A while PAAS is 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
5873.13%
Some yoy growth while PAAS is negative at -72.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
99.48%
SBC growth while PAAS is negative at -1.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-35.80%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PAAS is 210.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-84.06%
AR is negative yoy while PAAS is 386.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
123.20%
Inventory growth well above PAAS's 60.19%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
170.90%
Lower AP growth vs. PAAS's 2648.56%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
150.68%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PAAS's 364.92%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-41373.38%
Both negative yoy, with PAAS at -82.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-25.13%
Negative yoy CFO while PAAS is 161.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-205.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while PAAS is 3.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.44%
Purchases growth of 61.44% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5417.49%
Growth well above PAAS's 584.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-161.69%
We reduce yoy invests while PAAS stands at 0.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
0.50%
We repay more while PAAS is negative at -28.22%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-96.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -50.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.