PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 109.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.21%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PAAS at -7.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
46.81%
Some yoy growth while PAAS is negative at -53.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-12.71%
Negative yoy SBC while PAAS is 6215.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-138.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PAAS is 127.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-57.16%
AR is negative yoy while PAAS is 261.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-60.23%
Negative yoy inventory while PAAS is 186.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-369.57%
Both negative yoy AP, with PAAS at -283.62%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-116.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PAAS at -118.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
92.37%
Some yoy increase while PAAS is negative at -513.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-21.46%
Negative yoy CFO while PAAS is 145.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-136.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while PAAS is 46.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. PAAS's 43284.42%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-3857.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while PAAS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while PAAS is 2852.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5988.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -80.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-146.85%
We reduce yoy invests while PAAS stands at 580.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -5837.15%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
233.43%
We slightly raise equity while PAAS is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.