95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.98%
Some net income increase while PAAS is negative at -387.27%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.16%
Less D&A growth vs. PAAS's 105.20%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
193.24%
Some yoy growth while PAAS is negative at -264.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-39.38%
Negative yoy SBC while PAAS is 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
181.32%
Well above PAAS's 3.75% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
151.10%
AR growth while PAAS is negative at -85.08%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-70.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PAAS at -127.09%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
113.08%
AP growth well above PAAS's 93.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-1069.64%
Negative yoy usage while PAAS is 212.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
111.57%
Well above PAAS's 133.99%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
49.79%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PAAS's 128.07%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-174.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -193.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.62%
Purchases growth of 99.62% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.11%
We reduce yoy other investing while PAAS is 5300.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-3.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -116.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
12.38%
Debt repayment well below PAAS's 68.75%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-88.06%
Negative yoy issuance while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.