PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.73%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 52.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-5.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PAAS at -6.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-16.14%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PAAS stands at 283.22%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.30%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PAAS at -7.69%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-129.02%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PAAS at -136.14%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-266.58%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PAAS at -89.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
172.76%
Inventory growth well above PAAS's 190.91%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
440.48%
AP growth well above PAAS's 139.21%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
110.07%
Some yoy usage while PAAS is negative at -157.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-44.47%
Both negative yoy, with PAAS at -240.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-15.45%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PAAS at -2.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-6.60%
Negative yoy CapEx while PAAS is 3.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while PAAS stands at 6576.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16048.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while PAAS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.07%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PAAS at -93.39%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
157.57%
We have some outflow growth while PAAS is negative at -55.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-133.09%
We reduce yoy invests while PAAS stands at 464.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
4.52%
We repay more while PAAS is negative at -224.80%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-92.39%
Negative yoy issuance while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
92.39%
Buyback growth of 92.39% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.