95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.65%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 39.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.99%
Negative yoy D&A while PAAS is 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
97.55%
Well above PAAS's 34.90% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-80.37%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PAAS at -11.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-24.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PAAS at -229.68%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
1201.96%
AR growth while PAAS is negative at -424.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while PAAS is negative at -310.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-284.77%
Both negative yoy AP, with PAAS at -164.22%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-84.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PAAS at -98.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
8917.28%
Well above PAAS's 135.42%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-11.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PAAS at -63.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.80%
Lower CapEx growth vs. PAAS's 26.85%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while PAAS is negative at -98.91%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
82.91%
Purchases growth of 82.91% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PAAS at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-30.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -111.06%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
2.50%
We have mild expansions while PAAS is negative at -22.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-3.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -70.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
103.42%
Issuance growth of 103.42% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.