95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-43.00%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 88.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.42%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PAAS stands at 1179.95%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-36.46%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PAAS at -375.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
9.16%
Less working capital growth vs. PAAS's 41.67%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
1691.76%
AR growth while PAAS is negative at -429.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-137.15%
Negative yoy usage while PAAS is 533.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
156.30%
Some yoy increase while PAAS is negative at -368.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
25.61%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 21.18%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-275.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -13.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2979.51%
We reduce yoy other investing while PAAS is 518.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-301.07%
We reduce yoy invests while PAAS stands at 367.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
200.67%
We repay more while PAAS is negative at -714.21%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.