95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.35%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 65.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
15.76%
Some D&A expansion while RGLD is negative at -2.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-205.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RGLD stands at 297.73%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
26.13%
SBC growth of 26.13% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
71.22%
Slight usage while RGLD is negative at -628.37%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2500.00%
Negative yoy usage while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
26.13%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. RGLD's 84.16%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-6.87%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RGLD at -1.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.81%
Purchases growth of 58.81% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30466.32%
We reduce yoy other investing while RGLD is 86.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1684.43%
We reduce yoy invests while RGLD stands at 98.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.01%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. RGLD's 103381.50%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.