95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.33%
Net income growth under 50% of RGLD's 401.89%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.29%
D&A growth of 13.29% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-342.07%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RGLD stands at 49.73%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-35.10%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RGLD at -65.36%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
12.04%
Well above RGLD's 18.43% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
AP growth well above RGLD's 80.25%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -249.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
92.91%
Some yoy increase while RGLD is negative at -1.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
16.30%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of RGLD's 3994.07%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
100.00%
CapEx growth well above RGLD's 93.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1640.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5926.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while RGLD is 50.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1645.23%
We reduce yoy invests while RGLD stands at 97.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while RGLD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.