95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.36%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 20.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-32.92%
Negative yoy D&A while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-85.55%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
25.51%
Less SBC growth vs. RGLD's 121.22%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-230.54%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RGLD is 337.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1258.62%
AR is negative yoy while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-175.87%
Both negative yoy AP, with RGLD at -93.74%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
211.90%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. RGLD's 915.36%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-575.00%
Negative yoy while RGLD is 83.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-25.60%
Negative yoy CFO while RGLD is 36.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-206.82%
We reduce yoy other investing while RGLD is 436.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-103909.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -44.41%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.