95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.72%
Some net income increase while RGLD is negative at -40.38%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
66.29%
Some D&A expansion while RGLD is negative at -6.19%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-104.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RGLD stands at 138.30%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-72.78%
Negative yoy SBC while RGLD is 77.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
854.67%
Slight usage while RGLD is negative at -129.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-85.24%
AR is negative yoy while RGLD is 134.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.23%
Lower AP growth vs. RGLD's 437.86%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-3700.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -134.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-95.51%
Both negative yoy, with RGLD at -5.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
22.62%
Some CFO growth while RGLD is negative at -33.40%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
99.88%
CapEx growth well above RGLD's 99.59%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-117.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -106.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
99.43%
Investing outflow well above RGLD's 92.92%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
91.50%
Debt repayment growth of 91.50% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.