PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.92%
Net income growth similar to RGLD's 170.47%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
3.19%
Some D&A expansion while RGLD is negative at -12.49%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
0.25%
Some yoy growth while RGLD is negative at -1024.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
177.90%
SBC growth well above RGLD's 89.79%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-55.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RGLD is 2.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-509.30%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RGLD at -186.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. RGLD's 83.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-101.84%
Both negative yoy, with RGLD at -17.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
30.24%
Some CFO growth while RGLD is negative at -1.41%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
70800.00%
Liquidation growth of 70800.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
16528.30%
Growth well above RGLD's 699.75%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
1431.96%
Investing outflow well above RGLD's 161.23%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
6.80%
Debt repayment well below RGLD's 86.49%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.