95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.54%
Net income growth under 50% of RGLD's 51.16%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.18%
Less D&A growth vs. RGLD's 16.95%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-76.49%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RGLD stands at 1573.80%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-649.14%
Negative yoy SBC while RGLD is 11.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-295.69%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -687.73%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-3131.59%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RGLD at -63.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
147.24%
AP growth well above RGLD's 11.15%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-1616.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -534.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-919.60%
Negative yoy while RGLD is 16.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-6.78%
Negative yoy CFO while RGLD is 31.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
58.29%
Some CapEx rise while RGLD is negative at -154.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.58%
Negative yoy purchasing while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-101.56%
We reduce yoy sales while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-188.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -10749.43%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-56.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -181.83%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.91%
We repay more while RGLD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-86.06%
Negative yoy issuance while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.