95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RGLD at -13.98%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-21.66%
Negative yoy D&A while RGLD is 9.47%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
148.87%
Some yoy growth while RGLD is negative at -104.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
146.24%
SBC growth well above RGLD's 0.60%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
156.82%
Well above RGLD's 138.17% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
137.26%
AR growth while RGLD is negative at -215.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.44%
A yoy AP increase while RGLD is negative at -146.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
202.40%
Growth well above RGLD's 153.30%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
166.77%
Well above RGLD's 10.62%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-6.99%
Negative yoy CFO while RGLD is 7.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
97.21%
Some CapEx rise while RGLD is negative at -209.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
138.24%
Liquidation growth of 138.24% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
84.20%
Growth well above RGLD's 18.07%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
89.72%
We have mild expansions while RGLD is negative at -186.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-13.29%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RGLD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-68.20%
Negative yoy issuance while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.