95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.44%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 23.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-4.62%
Negative yoy D&A while RGLD is 43.73%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-203.03%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9953.49%
SBC growth while RGLD is negative at -14.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
14.17%
Slight usage while RGLD is negative at -801.44%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1.54%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RGLD at -349.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
388.85%
Inventory growth well above RGLD's 299.23%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-14.78%
Both negative yoy AP, with RGLD at -343.77%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-37.48%
Negative yoy usage while RGLD is 221.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
57.18%
Well above RGLD's 43.45%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
11.35%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x RGLD's 6.35%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
283.86%
CapEx growth well above RGLD's 69.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.73%
Purchases growth of 79.73% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.14%
We reduce yoy other investing while RGLD is 92.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
284.00%
Investing outflow well above RGLD's 69.59%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
1.99%
We repay more while RGLD is negative at -50.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
4483.93%
Issuance growth of 4483.93% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-4483.93%
We cut yoy buybacks while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.