PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.73%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RGLD at -22.17%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-5.58%
Negative yoy D&A while RGLD is 4.23%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-16.14%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RGLD stands at 113.70%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.30%
Negative yoy SBC while RGLD is 42.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-129.02%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -64.96%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-266.58%
AR is negative yoy while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
172.76%
Some inventory rise while RGLD is negative at -14.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
440.48%
A yoy AP increase while RGLD is negative at -89.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
110.07%
Some yoy usage while RGLD is negative at -68.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-44.47%
Negative yoy while RGLD is 3.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-15.45%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RGLD at -9.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-6.60%
Negative yoy CapEx while RGLD is 99.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16048.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.07%
We reduce yoy sales while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
157.57%
We have some outflow growth while RGLD is negative at -95.65%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-133.09%
We reduce yoy invests while RGLD stands at 99.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
4.52%
Debt repayment well below RGLD's 25.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-92.39%
Negative yoy issuance while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
92.39%
Buyback growth of 92.39% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.