PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 26.83%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
55.61%
Some D&A expansion while RGLD is negative at -1.18%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-167.85%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
50.53%
SBC growth while RGLD is negative at -14.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
680.22%
Slight usage while RGLD is negative at -200.15%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
109.57%
AR growth of 109.57% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-364.99%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RGLD at -92.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-41.31%
Negative yoy AP while RGLD is 3705.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2108.31%
Some yoy usage while RGLD is negative at -237.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-644.39%
Both negative yoy, with RGLD at -99.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
45.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x RGLD's 3.02%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-396.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while RGLD is 33575.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-152781.91%
Negative yoy acquisition while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
12.62%
Purchases growth of 12.62% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
35189753.73%
Liquidation growth of 35189753.73% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-165.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -128750.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-379.21%
We reduce yoy invests while RGLD stands at 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
15.38%
Debt repayment growth of 15.38% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
2091.46%
Issuance growth of 2091.46% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
267.80%
Buyback growth of 267.80% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.