PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RGLD at -24.64%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-9.99%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with RGLD at -3.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
97.55%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. RGLD's 241.48%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-80.37%
Negative yoy SBC while RGLD is 26.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-24.39%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RGLD is 1313.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
1201.96%
AR growth well above RGLD's 475.01%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while RGLD is negative at -2685.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-284.77%
Both negative yoy AP, with RGLD at -94.39%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-84.71%
Negative yoy usage while RGLD is 1039.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
8917.28%
Well above RGLD's 11071.05%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-11.81%
Negative yoy CFO while RGLD is 36.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.80%
Some CapEx rise while RGLD is negative at -141.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
82.91%
Purchases growth of 82.91% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RGLD is 23464.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-30.43%
We reduce yoy other investing while RGLD is 88.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
2.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. RGLD's 1179650.00%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-3.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -33.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
103.42%
Issuance growth of 103.42% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.