95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.02%
Some net income increase while SA is negative at -28.18%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.50%
Negative yoy D&A while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-900.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-55.35%
Negative yoy SBC while SA is 49.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
204.75%
Well above SA's 99.54% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above SA's 101.59%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-163.11%
Negative yoy while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.42%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SA's 84.72%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
62.15%
CapEx growth well above SA's 54.01%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SA is 44.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
5292.00%
Growth of 5292.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
140.21%
Investing outflow well above SA's 155.87%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -77.96%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
95.53%
Buyback growth of 95.53% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.