95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.33%
Some net income increase while SA is negative at -2352.05%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.29%
Less D&A growth vs. SA's 1088.89%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-342.07%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-35.10%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SA at -59.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
12.04%
Slight usage while SA is negative at -233.84%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth while SA is negative at -290.53%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SA at -219.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
92.91%
Some yoy increase while SA is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
16.30%
Some CFO growth while SA is negative at -344.59%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
100.00%
Some CapEx rise while SA is negative at -284.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1640.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while SA stands at 181.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5926.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while SA is 19.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1645.23%
We reduce yoy invests while SA stands at 103.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.