PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-306.84%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SA at -239.15%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
24.09%
Some D&A expansion while SA is negative at -33.92%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
18.64%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SA's 1446.09%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
56.24%
SBC growth while SA is negative at -31.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
1195.30%
Slight usage while SA is negative at -259.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
234.43%
AR growth well above SA's 46.02%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-154.67%
Negative yoy AP while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
328.50%
Some yoy usage while SA is negative at -303.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
78913.17%
Well above SA's 63.75%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
27.85%
Some CFO growth while SA is negative at -2015.71%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16340.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while SA is 56.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18431.68%
We reduce yoy other investing while SA is 254.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-18333.02%
We reduce yoy invests while SA stands at 237.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
15.15%
Debt repayment growth of 15.15% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.