PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.92%
Some net income increase while SA is negative at -24.07%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.19%
D&A growth of 3.19% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
0.25%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SA's 166.09%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
177.90%
SBC growth well above SA's 23.32%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-55.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SA is 235.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-509.30%
AR is negative yoy while SA is 92.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SA's 42050.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-101.84%
Both negative yoy, with SA at -73.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
30.24%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SA's 54.47%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-1.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -153.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
70800.00%
We have some liquidation growth while SA is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
16528.30%
We have some outflow growth while SA is negative at -6662.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1431.96%
We have mild expansions while SA is negative at -730.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
6.80%
Debt repayment growth of 6.80% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.