PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.90%
Some net income increase while SA is negative at -354.23%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.33%
Negative yoy D&A while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-14030.23%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-87.74%
Negative yoy SBC while SA is 306.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-147.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SA at -114.27%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
134.82%
AR growth while SA is negative at -59.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.24%
Growth of 8.24% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-202.13%
Negative yoy while SA is 83.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-8.83%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SA at -253.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
64.30%
Some CapEx rise while SA is negative at -1045.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while SA is negative at -0.28%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
129.23%
Liquidation growth of 129.23% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
69.70%
Growth well above SA's 16.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
200.22%
We have mild expansions while SA is negative at -835.95%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-91.19%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.