PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.54%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 439.51%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.18%
Less D&A growth vs. SA's 4.76%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-76.49%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SA stands at 1898.96%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-649.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SA at -99.73%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-295.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SA is 279.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-3131.59%
AR is negative yoy while SA is 240.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
147.24%
AP growth of 147.24% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-1616.70%
Negative yoy usage while SA is 372.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-919.60%
Both negative yoy, with SA at -7546.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-6.78%
Negative yoy CFO while SA is 136.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
58.29%
Some CapEx rise while SA is negative at -62.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.58%
Negative yoy purchasing while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-101.56%
We reduce yoy sales while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-188.06%
We reduce yoy other investing while SA is 701.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-56.08%
We reduce yoy invests while SA stands at 122.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.91%
Debt repayment growth of 99.91% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-86.06%
Negative yoy issuance while SA is 247.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.