PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.33%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 403.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
14.34%
Less D&A growth vs. SA's 236.36%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-70.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SA stands at 645.10%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-268.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SA at -90.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
146.27%
Well above SA's 172.24% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
186.50%
AR growth while SA is negative at -39.70%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-274.44%
Negative yoy inventory while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
5.27%
AP growth of 5.27% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-33.05%
Negative yoy usage while SA is 145.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-55.38%
Both negative yoy, with SA at -6836.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-1.99%
Negative yoy CFO while SA is 158.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
66.20%
Some CapEx rise while SA is negative at -169.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.92%
Some yoy expansion while SA is negative at -2647.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SA is 12.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
72.51%
We have mild expansions while SA is negative at -10136.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -514.29%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-69.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -34.88%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.