PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.73%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SA at -158.90%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-5.58%
Negative yoy D&A while SA is 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-16.14%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SA stands at 143.11%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.30%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SA at -10.83%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-129.02%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SA at -227.81%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-266.58%
AR is negative yoy while SA is 82.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
172.76%
Inventory growth of 172.76% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
440.48%
AP growth of 440.48% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
110.07%
Some yoy usage while SA is negative at -150.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-44.47%
Negative yoy while SA is 72.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-15.45%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SA at -50.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-6.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -54.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16048.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -637363.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-100.07%
We reduce yoy sales while SA is 4475.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
157.57%
Growth well above SA's 134.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-133.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -78.17%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
4.52%
We repay more while SA is negative at -60.94%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-92.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -72.08%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
92.39%
Buyback growth of 92.39% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.