PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.74%
Some net income increase while SA is negative at -319.03%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
55.61%
Less D&A growth vs. SA's 188.24%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-167.85%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
50.53%
SBC growth well above SA's 1.31%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
680.22%
Well above SA's 259.52% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
109.57%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. SA's 869.97%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-364.99%
Negative yoy inventory while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-41.31%
Negative yoy AP while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2108.31%
Growth well above SA's 143.62%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-644.39%
Negative yoy while SA is 493.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
45.21%
Some CFO growth while SA is negative at -39.67%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-396.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while SA is 13.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-152781.91%
Negative yoy acquisition while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
12.62%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. SA's 99.48%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
35189753.73%
We have some liquidation growth while SA is negative at -83.19%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-165.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -5773.45%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-379.21%
We reduce yoy invests while SA stands at 23.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
15.38%
Debt repayment growth of 15.38% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
2091.46%
Stock issuance far above SA's 640.13%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
267.80%
Buyback growth of 267.80% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.