PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.65%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 63.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.99%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SA at -3.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
97.55%
Well above SA's 166.39% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-80.37%
Negative yoy SBC while SA is 53.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-24.39%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SA is 23.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
1201.96%
AR growth well above SA's 66.91%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-284.77%
Negative yoy AP while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-84.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SA at -123.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
8917.28%
Some yoy increase while SA is negative at -97.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-11.81%
Negative yoy CFO while SA is 118.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.80%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SA's 38.27%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
82.91%
Purchases well above SA's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-30.43%
We reduce yoy other investing while SA is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
2.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SA's 38.58%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-3.50%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SA is 2.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
103.42%
We slightly raise equity while SA is negative at -68.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.