PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.56%
Net income growth above 1.5x SAND's 50.56%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
208.27%
D&A growth of 208.27% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
100.00%
Well above SAND's 10.85% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 1.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
170.61%
Less working capital growth vs. SAND's 767.77%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.05%
Inventory growth of 145.05% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.84%
Growth of 152.84% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
450.78%
Some yoy increase while SAND is negative at -93.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
136.40%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -5.34%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
100.00%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -176.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.68%
We have some outflow growth while SAND is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
83.68%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -43.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5117.95%
Issuance growth of 5117.95% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.