Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 84.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.

D&A growth of 35.54% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.

Deferred tax of 61.18% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.

Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.

Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -82.24%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.

Negative yoy usage while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.

Both negative yoy, with SAND at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.

Negative yoy purchasing while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Growth of 98.42% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.

We expand invests by 96.41% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Issuance growth of 168.90% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.