PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.24%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -767.67%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-37.18%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-547.31%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SAND is 422.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-547.31%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
672.04%
Some yoy increase while SAND is negative at -90284330526169216.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-3.85%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -2029.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.07%
Growth of 9.07% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
60.12%
We expand invests by 60.12% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.35%
We slightly raise equity while SAND is negative at -3982.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.