PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
51.37%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -3089.74%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.80%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -10.75%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.04%
SBC growth well above SAND's 22.03%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
312.06%
Well above SAND's 213.63% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
429.88%
Well above SAND's 90.35%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
56.41%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of SAND's 71.98%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
98.98%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -2692.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
51.72%
Acquisition growth of 51.72% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-379.17%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
96.81%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -2692.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SAND is 790654.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.