PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
77.62%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 1733.03%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
29.04%
Less D&A growth vs. SAND's 622.95%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
30.29%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SAND's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-0.38%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 269.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
240.82%
Less working capital growth vs. SAND's 822.90%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-804.96%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -5805.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
76.90%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SAND's 1762.02%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4958.07%
Negative yoy purchasing while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.30%
We have some outflow growth while SAND is negative at -128.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
84.97%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -2696.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.