PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.36%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -7.99%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-32.92%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SAND at -15.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-85.55%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
25.51%
SBC growth while SAND is negative at -12.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-230.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -0.31%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1258.62%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 74.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-175.87%
Negative yoy AP while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
211.90%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -27.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-575.00%
Negative yoy while SAND is 357.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-25.60%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -5.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while SAND is negative at -14.95%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-206.82%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-103909.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -255.17%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.