PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.45%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -19.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.16%
D&A growth well above SAND's 2.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-2167.50%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
45.26%
SBC growth well above SAND's 1.66%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
45.47%
Less working capital growth vs. SAND's 156.56%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-539.55%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 122.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
135.90%
AP growth of 135.90% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-63.22%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 2.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
39.33%
Well above SAND's 9.23%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-10.70%
Negative yoy CFO while SAND is 33.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
99.96%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 97.36%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -709.14%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
96.69%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -83.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.