95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
124.21%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SAND's 152.72%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
4.94%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -1.89%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
68.61%
Well above SAND's 119.11% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
58.28%
SBC growth while SAND is negative at -12.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-322.37%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SAND is 1001.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-189.44%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -115.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-637.34%
Negative yoy AP while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-204.46%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 1341.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-99.59%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -121.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-14.72%
Negative yoy CFO while SAND is 94.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
99.97%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 95.95%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.73%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SAND's 500.79%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
99.90%
Investing outflow well above SAND's 97.94%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-352.38%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-332.68%
We cut yoy buybacks while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.