PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.16%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -60.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.22%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -1.92%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
262.53%
Well above SAND's 188.16% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-125.20%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SAND at -1.53%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
77.19%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -153.56%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-314.48%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -794.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
236.47%
AP growth of 236.47% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-244.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -128.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-132.63%
Negative yoy while SAND is 125.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
18.03%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -7.74%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-648.91%
Negative yoy CapEx while SAND is 27.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.99%
Growth well above SAND's 128.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-125.59%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 296.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-600.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -169.23%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 74.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.