PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
463.45%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 36752.63%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-27.57%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SAND at -46.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
187.12%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SAND's 904.80%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
125.06%
SBC growth well above SAND's 24.57%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-173.43%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -16.86%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-104.09%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -34.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-164.98%
Negative yoy AP while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-92.04%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 55.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-101.27%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -68.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-31.36%
Negative yoy CFO while SAND is 18.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
59.68%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -3584.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1018.69%
Growth well above SAND's 19.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
104.55%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -151.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
15.13%
Debt repayment well below SAND's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.