PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
149.47%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -47.53%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-25.37%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 169920.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-123.35%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-26.10%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SAND at -2.74%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-221.07%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -983.73%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-70.14%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -1235.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-228.70%
Negative yoy AP while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-79.14%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -292.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-99.15%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -33.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-24.07%
Negative yoy CFO while SAND is 13.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
75.30%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -5258.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.89%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SAND's 2281.10%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
98.85%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -1185.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-27.38%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.