95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
367.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x SAND's 76.88%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
9.08%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -9.28%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-541.62%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 179.12%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
228.68%
SBC growth well above SAND's 0.54%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
42.28%
Less working capital growth vs. SAND's 173.19%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-650.18%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 222.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.65%
AP growth of 219.65% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-1121.57%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 67.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-13087.56%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -63.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
7.87%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SAND's 23.88%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-302604.43%
Negative yoy CapEx while SAND is 99.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11252.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -115.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-173056.25%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 83.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
26.17%
Debt repayment well below SAND's 85.71%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.