PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.31%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 218.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.58%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -13.25%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
127.08%
Some yoy growth while SAND is negative at -43.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-72.04%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 7.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
266.55%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -134.60%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
223.37%
AR growth while SAND is negative at -132.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.73%
Negative yoy AP while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
144.39%
Growth well above SAND's 115.95%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
101.73%
Some yoy increase while SAND is negative at -44.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -21.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.94%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SAND's 82.46%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-377.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while SAND stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-377.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -4.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-79.34%
We reduce yoy sales while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
108.52%
Growth well above SAND's 47.35%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-21.74%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 50.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
64.56%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of SAND's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.