PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-79.93%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 31.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.87%
D&A growth well above SAND's 7.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
2028.04%
Well above SAND's 86.92% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
468.64%
SBC growth well above SAND's 2.32%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
264.57%
Well above SAND's 41.13% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-119.34%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 59.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
1196.43%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -337.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-185.37%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -220.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
0.04%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -2.49%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
99.89%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 55.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while SAND is negative at -161.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SAND at -10.47%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-348.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -266.76%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
99.78%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -256.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-316.07%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.