PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-317.43%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -2.52%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-10.17%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 29.82%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-2407.27%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
193.99%
SBC growth well above SAND's 0.95%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
164.98%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -189.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
81.49%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. SAND's 284.76%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.83%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -211.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
11191.88%
Some yoy increase while SAND is negative at -34.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.56%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -4.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-331.03%
Negative yoy CapEx while SAND is 95.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.34%
Growth well above SAND's 155.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-38.80%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 102.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-9.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -193.75%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.